Monthly Archives: August 2011

August 29, 2011

Gatorade – A Sports Drink or a Mouthwash

via Dan Peterson

What is it about Gatorade that has athletes so hooked? Is it the taste? The feel of an ice-cold beverage quenching their thirst? An increase in performance? Or could it possibly be the amount of sugar that makes up these drinks? Scientists at the University of Birmingham carried out a series of experiments1 that offer some insight as to how the sugary component of the drink may be linked to improvements in performance. In one study, two groups of cyclists were timed for a 40 km bike ride. One group was given a drink filled with carbohydrates and electrolytes (much like Gatorade) and the other group got a regular drink with …

read more

August 24, 2011

There are no such thing as hot streaks

via Dan Peterson

Over at his blog, The Frontal Cortex, Jonah Lehrer has a post that references one of the most interesting and baffling studies on athletes ever performed.  In 1985, Amos Taversky and Thomas Gilovich, two absolute giants in the field of cognitive psychology, looked at the shooting performance of the Philadelphia 76er’s, the Boston Celtics and the Cornell University men’s basketball team to see if what had happened over a player’s previous shots had any future, predictive effect on his next shot–are players on a shooting streak more likely to stay on that streak? Here’s what they found: Over 90% of basketball fans believe that a player has a better chance of …

read more

Tags: , , ,

August 19, 2011

Sport-specific memory and information chunking

via Dan Peterson

One of the most interesting distinctions to think about when we’re talking about athletes and cognition is the difference between the reactive, lighting-quick decision making that happens on the field, and the slower, more deliberate though involved in what often gets called “strategy”. Both are important, but both are different.  In some ways the divide mirrors the difference between implicit or procedural memory–skills that we execute without thinking consciously about them, like riding a bike–and explicit or declarative memory, which are memories that we call forth, like remembering the capitol of California. Th high-speed recognition of anticipatory cues, discussed a few weeks ago, is a skill that falls more into the …

read more

Tags: , , ,

August 17, 2011

The science behind choking

via Dan Peterson

Free throw shooting in basketball offers one of the best opportunities to look at the effects of pressure on athletic performance.  Most NBA players can stand around in an empty gym and knock down free throw after free throw.  It’s one of those skills that has been so refined by deliberate practice that it’s basically performed on autopilot.  But it’s a different story to put that same player in a pressure-packed situation, in front of a crowd, with the game on the line.  In research conducted by Art Markman at the University of Texas, it appears that NBA players are more likely to choke in critical, late-game situations: The  highest pressure …

read more

Tags: , , , , ,

August 16, 2011

The 10,000 hour rule and expert athletic performance

via Dan Peterson

Some of the oldest and most prominent cliches that athletes are fed on a day-in, day-out basis revolve around practice (e.g. “practice makes perfect”).  Like a lot of cliches, these sayings are boring but turn out to be true. Recently, research surrounding the concept of practice and expertise has begun to be supported by neuroscience.  Best selling books like Malcolm Gladwells’ Outliers and Daniel Coyle’s The Talent Code have taken aim at traditional conceptions of talent, arguing that rather than an innate predisposition toward greatness, the limiting factor in expertise and achievement is actually grit, tenacity and the willingness to put in countless hours practicing a skill. Specifically, K Anders Ericcson …

read more

Tags: , , , , ,

August 12, 2011

Do athletes have superior decision-making abilities?

via Dan Peterson

The idea that athletes might be better at making high-speed decisions that are specific to their sport is an intuitive one, based on what we know about the brain and how it changes with deliberate practice. The last few posts have focused on just how athletes’ brains may change as they acquire expertise, and how it is often difficult to truly measure these differences. A recent study published in The Journal of the American College of Sports Medicine points to some very interesting potential differences in the way that athletes and non-athletes make high-speed decisions. Groups of college students, half of them division I varsity athletes, half of them pulled from …

read more

Tags: , , ,

Planets Twitter Rss Facebook